Resources

The Top 10 Best Accessibility Testing Companies

 

Table of Contents


Free Audit

The best accessibility testing companies, such as Recite Me, TPGi, and Deque, combine automated and manual testing to get the most accurate results. Automated testing does the heavy lifting to detect around 40-50% of all website accessibility issues. Then manual testing swoops in to do the bits that automated testing can’t.

In this guide, you’ll find the top 10 best companies for website accessibility testing right now.

Who are the best digital accessibility testing companies?

The best digital accessibility testing companies include names like Recite Me, TPGi, QualityLogic, Deque, AbilityNet, and more. We’ll get into a deep dive on each soon. But for now, let’s look at how they rank and the testing services they provide.

RankBrandRatingTesting services offered
#1Recite Me4.8 ⭐Automated & manual
#2TPGi4.7 ⭐Automated & manual
#3QualityLogic4.7 ⭐Manual
#4Deque4.6 ⭐Automated & manual
#5AbilityNet4.5 ⭐Automated & manual
#6AudioEye4.5 ⭐Automated & manual
#7UsableNet4.4 ⭐Automated & manual
#8Axess Lab4.3 ⭐Manual
#9Zoonou4.2 ⭐Automated & manual
#10Level Access4.1 ⭐Automated & manual

A closer look at the best companies for accessibility testing

Want to know more about what each of these companies offers? Each profile below covers what the company tests, how it tests, and where it may fall short.

#1 – Recite Me

Recite Me has a full-suite digital accessibility platform that provides automated scans of your websites, PDFs, and other areas to identify and fix compliance violations at all levels of WCAG. Its accessibility checker flags common issues and gives AI-powered fixes and recommendations, so your team knows what to fix and how.

Automation only goes so far, though. That is why Recite Me also offers a consultancy service to support clients with the manual testing they need. That covers the journeys and components scanners miss, such as complex forms and screen reader flows. The result is one partner for regular scanning and human-led checks.

Advantages

  • Automated scans cover websites, PDFs and other digital areas
  • Checks and fixes apply to all WCAG levels
  • Consultancy support for manual testing
  • Strong G2 rating from verified reviewers

Drawbacks

  • Manual testing is a separate consultancy engagement
  • Pricing is not published, so you need to request a quote

#2 – TPGi

TPGi has been in accessibility for over 20 years, and its testing blends both approaches. Its audits combine manual expert reviews with automated scans, with results shown live in the ARC platform dashboard.

Any issues discovered during the work can be sent straight to Jira through the API, which suits engineering teams. For hands-on checks, TPGi offers JAWS Inspect, a tool that simulates the JAWS screen reader experience, and the free Colour Contrast Analyser. Its managed service also adds scheduled audits to catch regressions, plus a dedicated project manager.

Advantages

  • Manual and automated results sit in one dashboard
  • Jira integration through the ARC API
  • Free Colour Contrast Analyser tool
  • Over 20 years of experience

Drawbacks

  • Pricing is quoted per scope, with no public rate card
  • Very few public reviews to compare
tgpi

#3 – QualityLogic

QualityLogic is a US software testing firm that has delivered more than 7,000 programs since 1986. Its accessibility work sits alongside general QA, so one team can handle both.

The company has certified specialists who audit web and mobile products against WCAG and Section 508. And they’re not testing randomly. They have a proper system in place, with real assistive technologies used to evaluate your website in real time. One county government recently praised the company on G2 for its auditing and the additional training they received.

Advantages

  • High rating from verified clients
  • Accessibility and general QA in one team
  • Testing with assistive technology
  • Teams scale up or down with your needs

Drawbacks

  • Services only, with no self-serve scanning tool
  • Minimum project size is $5,000 or more

#4 – Deque

Deque is best known for axe-core, the free open-source engine behind many accessibility scanners, including Google Lighthouse. On top of that sit paid tools like:

  • Axe DevTools: runs automated checks for web and mobile apps
  • Axe Monitor: scans whole sites and reports on progress
  • Axe Auditor: handles the manual side, with step-by-step guidance

Deque also sells expert audits and remediation help, and runs training through Deque University. That mix covers both testing types in one ecosystem. The catch? Listed pricing starts at $27,000 a year, so it suits companies with deep pockets.

Advantages

  • Free, widely used open-source engine
  • Guided manual testing for non-experts
  • Audits, remediation and training available
  • Strong user feedback

Drawbacks

  • Listed pricing starts at $27,000 a year
  • No Salesforce support
Deque

#5 – AbilityNet

AbilityNet is a UK charity that offers digital accessibility services to a variety of organisations. Its consultants use industry-standard software and manual checks to audit and test digital services. In its latest reported year, it ran 2,288 audits and reviews.

Options range from a quick digital accessibility review to a full audit, with lead times of about one to four weeks. But where AbilityNet really stands out is its user testing. Disabled testers use your site on real devices, and AbilityNet says this finds up to 45% more issues than an audit alone. It has worked with the British Museum and Barclays, among others.

Advantages

  • User testing with disabled people
  • Audit sizes from quick review to full audit
  • Clear lead times
  • Charity with 25+ years of experience

Drawbacks

  • No self-serve scanning platform for daily monitoring
  • Work is project based, so allow up to four weeks
AbilityNet logo

#6 – AudioEye

AudioEye’s website accessibility platform scans your site on an ongoing basis and applies automatic fixes to common issues. The company is honest about the fact that its automation finds only 30 to 50% of problems, so it backs the platform with expert audits carried out by assistive technology users.

New Agentic Audits and a testing SDK also help developers catch issues earlier. Most feedback on platforms such as G2 is positive, with reviewers rating the automated scans highly. However, some note that many issues still need manual input and that pricing can stretch smaller budgets.

Advantages

  • Continuous monitoring with automatic fixes
  • Expert audits by assistive technology users
  • Developer SDK for earlier testing
  • Strong G2 rating from 230+ reviews

Drawbacks

  • Manual testing required for full compliance
  • Reviewers cite pricing as a concern for budget-conscious teams

#7 – UsableNet

UsableNet has an AQA platform that brings manual and automated testing into one place. Automated site scans start by flagging issues at scale, while guided manual checks cover what scanners miss, such as how a page behaves with a screen reader and keyboard.

Reports grade issues as low, medium, or high, which helps teams plan fixes. Then, the Chrome extension and Jira integration plug the required work into developers’ pipelines. You also get access to services like VPAT documentation and mobile app testing.

Advantages

  • Manual and automated testing in one platform
  • Reports grade issues by severity
  • Chrome extension and Jira integration
  • Free trial available

Drawbacks

  • Some users found tests and audits confusing
  • Far fewer reviews than larger rivals
Usablenet

#8 – Axess Lab

Axess Lab is an accessibility consultancy that tests with people, not only tools. Its experts review your app or website, and the team also runs usability tests with people who have disabilities. It can even review physical devices and products in the place they are used. Then you’ve got training and accessible PDFs that round out the offer.

The company also offers a discount if you bundle its expert review and user testing services into one. And since its orders go through email or phone, it suits teams who prefer a personal approach to testing.

Advantages

  • Usability testing with disabled people
  • Reviews of physical devices as well as digital products
  • Discount for combined reviews and user tests

Drawbacks

  • No scanning platform for ongoing monitoring
  • Ordering by email or phone, not online

#9 – Zoonou

Zoonou is an accessibility testing company that specialises in public sector work. Its service is delivered manually by in-house test analysts, who audit code and user journeys against WCAG 2.1 and 2.2 at levels A, AA and AAA.

However, the team does use automated scans to improve speed and coverage. Their audits help specifically with legislation such as the Public Sector Bodies Accessibility Regulations and Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act. This makes it one of the strongest picks for public sector organisations.

Advantages

  • Manual audits up to WCAG level AAA
  • Section 508 Trusted Testers
  • Disabled user testing and PDF remediation
  • Wider QA and security testing from the same team

Drawbacks

  • Public sector focus may suit private firms less
  • Few public review scores to compare

#10 – Level Access

Level Access is an accessibility testing company with a broad range of features and benefits. Its hub includes everything from automated and manual testing to maintenance and analytics. And since Level Access acquired UserWay in 2024, an accessibility widget is now part of the product line-up.

Developers can enjoy a browser extension and CI/CD integrations to catch issues early, plus links to Jira and Azure DevOps. However, many customers argue that its depth makes the platform difficult to navigate, especially for non-technical users.

Advantages

  • Automated and manual testing in one hub
  • Managed services and training included
  • Developer integrations with Jira and Azure DevOps

Drawbacks

  • No public pricing
  • Some users find the platform difficult to navigate

Choose a company that best suits your business

The best accessibility testing company depends on the gap you need to fill. If you want automated scans and expert support in one place, Recite Me is the strongest all-round choice here. But if testing with real users matters to you, a company like AbilityNet, Axess Lab, or Zoonou might be better. Deque and Level Access are also solid picks if you have a developer-led team.

Best accessibility testing companies FAQs

Looking for a quick recap? Here are answers to some of the most frequently asked questions on this topic:

It checks your website or app against standards such as WCAG, finds barriers for disabled users, and reports what to fix. Many also help you fix and retest.

No, automation alone finds roughly 30 to 50% of issues. That’s why it’s important to supplement scans with manual checks and user testing.

Published agency rates put manual audits for a mid-sized e-commerce site at about $3,000 to $15,000. Platforms like Deque list from $27,000 a year.

Always test your website after major content updates or overhauls. A maintenance plan with ongoing tests every other month is also important to catch new issues as they appear.

Related Content

Best AI-Powered Website Accessibility Platforms

Compare the 10 best AI-powered website accessibility platforms and see how each uses AI to scan, fix and explain WCAG issues.

Read more: Best AI-Powered Website Accessibility Platforms

Best Website Accessibility Software: Top 10 Tools Compared

Compare the 10 best website accessibility software to find the right solution for testing and improving website accessibility.

Read more: Best Website Accessibility Software: Top 10 Tools Compared

What are the Best Website Accessibility Tools for your Business?

Discover the best website accessibility tools for your business, including accessibility testing, monitoring, compliance and remediation solutions.

Read more: What are the Best Website Accessibility Tools for your Business?